What do you mean, "at the expense"? They went off on a tangent, they were not mocking the prompt, or the prompter. This is not a difficult concept to grasp.
Personally I like it when a conversation (or even, gasp, jokes!) start up on one of my prompts, because it keeps it visible in flat view, and makes you more likely to get a fill, and I doubt I'm the only one.
If the OP doesn't like people interacting in their prompt thread, they can always take it to the mod. Or I guess this time you can do it on their behalf if you feel so strongly that no one should have fun here ever.
A conversation that involves killing or fucking an animal which the promoter has requested be included as a pet really is disgusting and bashing the prompt and prompter whether the animal is fanon or an element the op came up with on their own. Would you joke about fucking or killing a friend's pet to that friend's face?
Wtf? There was no mention of fucking animals?? You got that out of your own mind, you sick fuck.
There was a joke where a commenter pretended to get terminally confused about pairings, to the point where they acted like they thought another commenter was talking about Millicent/Finn. Nowhere did anyone describe or even hint at sexual activity with animals. Sadly you're the one oversexualising a mildly humorous joke here, you weirdo.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
Re: Millicent
(Anonymous) 2016-02-29 04:00 pm (UTC)(link)Personally I like it when a conversation (or even, gasp, jokes!) start up on one of my prompts, because it keeps it visible in flat view, and makes you more likely to get a fill, and I doubt I'm the only one.
If the OP doesn't like people interacting in their prompt thread, they can always take it to the mod. Or I guess this time you can do it on their behalf if you feel so strongly that no one should have fun here ever.
Re: Millicent
(Anonymous) 2016-02-29 05:09 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Millicent
(Anonymous) 2016-02-29 05:32 pm (UTC)(link)There was a joke where a commenter pretended to get terminally confused about pairings, to the point where they acted like they thought another commenter was talking about Millicent/Finn. Nowhere did anyone describe or even hint at sexual activity with animals. Sadly you're the one oversexualising a mildly humorous joke here, you weirdo.
Re: Millicent
(Anonymous) 2016-02-29 07:18 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Millicent
(Anonymous) 2016-02-29 07:53 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Millicent
(Anonymous) 2016-03-01 01:25 am (UTC)(link)Tbf, what ayrt said is true.
Re: Millicent
(Anonymous) 2016-02-29 10:31 pm (UTC)(link)